3.31.2009
Games the Oilers should have won...
With the Oilers ever embattled to attain the last playoff spot in the Western Conference race one only has to look back to team’s inability to win earlier in the season to find that the race does not need to be. The following in a list of games that had the Oilers pulled off would have positioned this team into a playoff spot currently instead of fighting for their lives at this point in the season.
Nov. 5, 2008
5-4 loss to the Jackets, up 4-2 with 17 minutes to play, end up falling asleep for 1 minute game tied 4-4 and give up a late one to lose the game.
Nov. 13, 2008
5-2 loss to the Maple Leafs, JDD’s first NHL loss, but still with the way that the Maple Leafs were slumping there is no excuse not to put away a terrible team
Nov. 15, 2008
3-2 Shootout loss to the Avalanche, strong game but give up the tying goal with 11 seconds left.
Dec 11, 2008
2-0 loss to the Panthers, at the time the Panthers were near the bottom of the Eastern Conference, out shoot the Panthers 41-16 but still the offensive touch is lacking like so often this year
Dec 30, 2008
3-2 loss to the Senators, the Senators came into the game on a long road losing steak only to snap it against the Oilers. Again the Oilers fail to close out a struggling hockey club.
Feb 21, 2009
3-2 shootout loss to the Flames, again the Oilers give up a late goal and lose in the shootout. Inability to close out teams evident.
As I looked at this list a couple of ideas came forward. First, the Oilers have been more consistent in the latter part of the season. Second, had the Oilers closed these games out you could add 10 points to their current total.
However, I would argue that if I am arbitrarily adding points for games the Oilers should have won then more then likely I should also be taking points away for games they should have lost so if we take only half the points the Oilers could have attained then they would have 5 extra which would place them tied for 6th with Columbus and holding a 3 point lead in the standings over the 9th place blues.
Posted by Jon G at 3/31/2009 1 comments
3.29.2009
4 Million in the NHL
Dustin Penner has endured quite a bit of flak this year from both coaches and fans.
From the MacT you have beauties such as:
•"We thought the contract ($4.25 million average for five years) was a starting point for him, but he views it as a finish line. I can't watch it, certainly not for another [3 1/2 years]"
•"He has to get his game to a level where he can help us, to this point, it hasn't gotten there.”
•"He's not competitive enough or fit enough to help us, so why put him back in? He's never been fit enough to help us, we signed him to be a top-two line player and that's kind of where it ended.”
• "We're at a critical time and we can't wait for players' games to round into shape. We need guys to perform."
The first three quotes are from middle November (1,2,3) with the last coming from earlier March (4).
From the fans you hear constant criticism such as:
•“Penner making it to the arena on time was a surprise. [Fortunately], the Anaheim Fire Department was able to use the Jaws of Life to un-wedge Penner from the 'Space Mountain' roller coaster car he was stuck on.”
•“If they can send him to the minors… go for it. If someone wants to claim him off of waivers… great as it would take the $$$$ off our books. But who will want to pay $4 mill a season for someone who has [underachieved] badly this year.”
•“I think that the problem is Penner was brought on to this team to fill a role that it is unrealistic for him to fulfill.”
While this is only a short synopsis these are the basic arguments that fans make in some of the hockey discussion forums (Sportnet 1,2 and HF boards 3).
Basically the fact comes down that some fans and the coach believe Penner to be: inconsistent, out of shape, and a waste of cap space.
With that being said I thought that I would focus on the first and last issue in the previous statement by comparing the forwards throughout the league that make within the 4 million dollar range. I excluded all players that made more money then Penner due to the fact that if possible the Oilers could fit those players under the cap space currently taken up by the aforementioned Penner. So without further adieu here is the list.
Name | Team | Age | Salary | GP | G | A | P | TOI/G | P/60 |
D. Penner | EDM | 26 | 4.25 | 72 | 17 | 19 | 36 | | 1.91 |
M. Ryder | | 28 | 4.00 | 66 | 26 | 23 | 49 | | 2.97 |
D. | BUF | 25 | 4.00 | 75 | 26 | 39 | 65 | | 2.44 |
E. Cole | | 29 | 4.00 | 75 | 18 | 19 | 37 | | 1.69 |
P. Sharp | CHI | 26 | 3.90 | 57 | 25 | 17 | 42 | | 2.44 |
M. Hedjuk | | 32 | 3.90 | 75 | 26 | 29 | 55 | | 2.20 |
J. Lehtinen | | 35 | 4.00 | 41 | 8 | 15 | 23 | | 1.74 |
B. Morrow | | 29 | 4.10 | 18 | 5 | 10 | 15 | | 2.34 |
N. Horton | | 23 | 4.00 | 61 | 20 | 22 | 42 | | 2.30 |
M. Handzus | | 31 | 4.00 | 75 | 17 | 22 | 39 | | 1.64 |
P.M. Bouchard | MIN | 24 | 4.08 | 71 | 16 | 30 | 46 | | 2.29 |
R. Lang | MTL | 37 | 4.00 | 50 | 18 | 21 | 39 | | 2.77 |
J.P. Dumont | | 30 | 4.00 | 75 | 15 | 43 | 58 | | 2.66 |
B. Gionta | NJD | 29 | 4.00 | 74 | 18 | 39 | 57 | | 2.73 |
M. Naslund | NYR | 34 | 4.00 | 76 | 23 | 20 | 43 | | 1.96 |
M. Comrie | OTT | 27 | 4.00 | 55 | 10 | 16 | 26 | | 1.78 |
M. Fisher | OTT | 28 | 4.20 | 70 | 12 | 17 | 29 | | 1.34 |
S. Hartnell | | 26 | 4.20 | 74 | 29 | 30 | 59 | | 2.70 |
B. Boyes | | 26 | 4.00 | 75 | 29 | 33 | 62 | | 2.57 |
K. Tkachuk | | 36 | 4.00 | 72 | 22 | 20 | 42 | | 2.04 |
J. Blake | TOR | 34 | 4.00 | 72 | 25 | 35 | 60 | | 2.72 |
P. Demitra | VAN | 33 | 4.00 | 61 | 18 | 31 | 49 | | 2.73 |
S. Federov | WSH | 38 | 4.00 | 46 | 8 | 20 | 28 | | 2.21 |
Average | | 29.8 | | 64.6 | 18.7 | 24.8 | 43.5 | | 2.27 |
For a closer look here are Penner’s stats in comparison with only the average.
D. Penner | EDM | 25 | 4.25 | 72 | 17 | 19 | 36 | | 1.91 |
Average | | 29.8 | | 64.6 | 18.7 | 24.8 | 43.5 | | 2.27 |
First, Penner is a big body, who is roughly 4 years younger then the average, and is/has not been injury prone having only missed games this season from being benched and overall has played about 7 games more than the average of the other players making the same amount of money.
Second, looking at point production he is only 2 goals away from being above average in said department, 6 assists shy of being above average in assists and as such 8 points from above average in the points category. As well, he has done this while playing over 2 minutes less per game then the statistical average.
Thus I would have to agree with Lowetide’s column that in fact the contract Penner signed has not been a bust. Penner is currently 26 years old and in his 3rd year of NHL hockey. My final comment would be that I would much rather have Penner on my team than many of the other players on the previous list.
Posted by Jon G at 3/29/2009 1 comments
Playoff hopes
Well I figured, that with 7 games left in the regular season, I would crawl out of the hole that I have been living in and actually post something for the first time in roughly a year. According to www.sportsclubstats.com the Oilers currently have a 48.7% chance of making the playoffs currently. A win against minnesota tomorrow would "increase" that chance by 15% and make the playoff tickets, I have paid so much for at least, useful.
Posted by Jon G at 3/29/2009 0 comments
3.04.2009
Appease the Fans!
So Tambellini decided to keep us waiting with baited breath until the very last possible moment today before making two trades. It was a relatively slow deadline day even though 22 trades were made. It was all the expected players and the only 'big name' guy to go was Jokinen. Calgary got pumped all day as the 'big players' even though they made only two trades. The Brian Burke love-in at TSN almost made me vomit. They cut off Eric Cole to go to Burke's presser, then five minutes after it was over they do a one on one interview with him and ask the same questions. All the while trades are starting to come in. Worst statement of the day? Pierre 'Monster' McGuire stating that basically the Oilers traded Pitkanen and Cole for O'sullivan. WHERE IS THE LOGIC IN THAT? On national television no less. I'll keep the rest short as we've all seen the trades.
- Very good value for Cole. The way I'm seeing it is Cole and a 5th for O'Sullivan and Kotalik. Kotalik is a UFA and O'sullivan has 2 years left at about 2.9. Cole was not resigning here so again, great value.
- I think the only team you could have traded Cole to is Carolina, its the one team that probably wouldn't treat him like a UFA as he surely signs there this summer. This is why Tambellini was able to get value for him.
- Frolov must not have been available as you HAVE to assume he was the Oilers first choice.
- Word out of Ryan Rishaug's mouth is that Kotalik is the guy to play #1 LW which goes against most fans initial thoughts. I don't understand why we gave up the 2nd for 20 games of this guy (who is a natural RW), but we shall see.
- O'sullivan: good AHL scorer with average NHL stats, 24 years old, shoots a lot (200 shots) but scores a little (14 goals). Rob Daum coached him with the Aeros in the AHL so he must have put word in on it. I take that as a good sign. He's a smallish offensive first forward, which we obviously have no shortage of on this team.
- Kotalik: Great shot, probably the second best shot on this team right now. Average player who is about a 45 point guy that can at least hold his own in both ends. I question whether he re-signs with us.
All in all, well played Tambellini, well played. You'll survive at least until draft day.
Posted by Backhand at 3/04/2009 0 comments
Labels: Cole, Deadline day, Kotalik, O'sullivan, Tambellini